Regulations/GAMP 5 / AI/Applicability
Applicability · GAMP 5 / AI

Applicability for GAMP 5 / AI.

This page turns scope and timing into a decision route. It separates who is in scope, what trigger applies, which date matters, and where teams should avoid premature compliance claims.

Source basis: GAMP 5 guidance and regulated computerized-system validation contextUse: evidence-readinessBoundary: not legal advice
GAMP 5 / AI TRACE ISPE GAMP 5 SOURCEEU GMP ANNEX 11EUDRALEX VOLUME PIC/S COMPUTERIZ
/ Applicability logic

Applicability begins with scope, not assumption.

GAMP 5 / AI
Applicability 01

GxP computerized systems

Systems supporting GMP, GCP, GLP, PV, or regulated quality decisions.

Applicability 02

AI-enabled functions

AI is relevant when model output affects regulated records, product quality, patient safety, or decisions.

Applicability 03

Non-GxP business AI

Should not be presented as GAMP validation work unless it affects regulated processes.

Applicability 04

Supplier systems

Cloud/SaaS/vendor dependencies need supplier evidence and responsibility clarity.

/ Dates and gates

Timing changes what can be responsibly claimed.

status gates
Gates

Track these before publishing a checklist or readiness claim.

2022 GAMP 5 second edition public status · 2011 Annex 11 public anchor · 2025 ISPE AI guide watch/source boundary · system go-live · configuration/model/data change · periodic review

06
/ Use cases

Regulated use cases need a decision record.

life sciences lens
Use case 01

Intended use and GxP impact

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. Validation depth follows use, patient/product impact, and regulated process dependency.

Use case 02

System lifecycle

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. Evidence planning covers selection, design/configuration, verification, operation, change, and retirement.

Use case 03

Supplier assessment

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. Vendor capability and outsourced responsibilities need documented review.

Use case 04

Data integrity

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. ALCOA+ style concerns appear in records, audit trails, access, and retention.

Use case 05

AI model behaviour

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. AI-enabled functions need boundaries, monitoring, and human review where needed.

Use case 06

Paid-source boundary

Use this as a trigger for GAMP 5 / AI applicability review, not as an automatic compliance conclusion. GAMP 5 can be linked and interpreted at a public-safe level, but protected guide content must not be reproduced.