What this workspace makes usable.
FDA CSAComputer Software Assurance for Production and Quality System Software is mapped here for regulated life-sciences, health-tech, AI governance, and operational quality work. FDA guidance for risk-based assurance of software used in medical device production and quality systems.
Guidance is nonbinding. iFeed maps CSA into assurance records and practical QMS evidence, not a validation prescription.
Intended use
Assurance starts with what the software is used for in the quality or production process.
Risk-based assurance
Higher-risk use needs stronger evidence; lower-risk use can avoid unnecessary burden.
Assurance activity selection
Testing approach should match risk and use, not follow a fixed ritual.
Objective evidence
Records should show what was checked, by whom, with what result.
Unscripted testing
Exploratory and ad hoc testing may be appropriate when justified and documented.
Automation support
Tools can support assurance but need their own fit-for-use rationale.
Change control
Software changes need traceable impact and assurance decisions.
QMS link
CSA sits inside production and quality system controls, not outside them.
Primary references stay visible.
official firstFDA CSA guidance
2026-02 · Current final guidance on computer software assurance for production and quality management system software; it supersedes the September 2025 final guidance.
FDA CSA guidance PDF
2026-02 · Guidance history notes February 2026 revisions to align terminology with QMSR amendments to Part 820.
The workspace can grow without breaking the source trail.
stable structureThe ten subchapters are fixed surfaces for future public assets.
Overview · Source Library · Articles & Clauses · Applicability · Interpretation · Evidence Readiness · AI Governance · Operational Flow · Actors & Services · Updates & Assets