Chapter 06 · Governance & Risk

Governance & Risk as a reviewable surface.

Foundational risk management links intended use to harm pathways, uncertainty, controls, accountability, and lifecycle review.

Focus: concept · data · model · evidenceRisk: confusing capability with readinessBridge: language · controls · records
Foundations traceConceptDataModelEvidenceHumanReviewAIsystemsource to workflow to evidence to review
/ 06

Governance & Risk chapter.

Foundations

Foundational risk management links intended use to harm pathways, uncertainty, controls, accountability, and lifecycle review.

/ A

What this page maps.

operating content
Risk taxonomy

Risk taxonomy

Clinical, privacy, cybersecurity, bias, reliability, operational, regulatory, reputational, and workload risks.

Control logic

Control logic

Controls match the use case: access, training, validation, documentation, review, monitoring, and escalation.

Accountability

Accountability

Names who approves, uses, challenges, pauses, updates, and retires the system.

/ B

Governance questions.

review logic
Question

What decision or record does this governance & risk surface influence, and who owns that decision?

Question

Which evidence is needed before routine use in Foundations, and where is it retained?

Question

What signal triggers review, restriction, escalation, or retirement?

/ evidence

Evidence-ready minimum record.

iFeed use
Minimum record
OwnerNamed operational, clinical, technical, and governance owners.
UseClear intended use, user group, workflow point, and excluded use.
RiskRisk tier, rationale, residual risks, controls, and escalation route.
EvidenceSource claims, validation basis, limitations, approval decision, and review date.
/ sources

Source anchors and claim boundary.

official first

These anchors support the source layer for this page. iFeed interpretation remains separate from source facts and does not replace legal, regulatory, clinical, or product-specific advice.