Gap analysis.
Diagnostic audit identifying specific gaps between current state and a regulatory benchmark — ICH M10, ICH E6(R3), QMSR, ICH M13A, EU MDR Article 117, or similar inflection.
The fit.
Any organisation facing a regulatory inflection. Pre-implementation gap-finding. Pre-inspection reality-check. Pre-audit dry-run.
What this delivers.
Gap analysis report with specific findings, remediation priorities, compliance roadmap. Available structured per-inflection (M10, E6R3, QMSR, M13A, Article 117) or as extended scope.
Where the edge is.
Structured per-inflection — M10 gap and QMSR gap are not the same exercise. Universal entry point: most engagements start here. Faster turnaround than firm-style engagements where the diagnostic gets buried in deliverable theatre.
The shape of the work.
Every engagement is scoped per situation. The shape — focused diagnostic, structured implementation, ongoing partnership — emerges from the discovery conversation rather than a fixed package. Some engagements are short and intense; some are months-long structural builds; some are recurring quality oversight. We talk first, then scope.
Discovery.
Confirm regulatory benchmark and audit scope.
Scoping.
Proposal aligned to inflection (tight-scope diagnostic vs extended-scope assessment).
Diagnostic.
Document review, interviews, on-site if needed.
Report.
Gap report, prioritised remediation roadmap, often leading to remediation engagement.